|
|
IN 1999 I DID MAKE PRERESENTATION TO MY FORMER EMPLOYER, N.F.C, INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS MOVING COMPANY, AT THE HEAD OFFICE BEDFORD, (UK)AND MADE A APPLICATION FOR THEM TO PAY ME, REDUNDANCY MONEY WHICH WAS DONE TO MYSELF.
THE CORRESPONDENCE WAS PASSED ON TO THEIR LEGAL DEPT. AT MILTON KEYNES AND THE ANSWER FROM THEM WAS THAT I WAS NOT DUE ANY REDUNDANCY PAYMENT'S. I WAS NOT ENTITLED TO ANY PAYMENTS AND DECIDED TO MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE ACCRINGTON COUNTY COURTS FOR A CLAIM FOR REDUNDANCY PAYMENT WHICH WAS DUE TO ME.
THE APPLICATION WAS SCHEDULED FOR THE 15TH NOVEMBER 1999 BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE GEDDES, AND THE DEFENDANT WHERE REPRESENTED BY A FIRM OF SOLICITOR EVERSHEDS OF LEEDS, THE DEFENDANT MADE APPLICATION TO THE COURTS, THAT MY APPLICATION SHOU;D BE STRUCK OUT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION, SAVE THAT COSTS OPF THE APPLICATION BE RESERVED.
I HAVE SINCE RECEIVED TWO COURT ORDERS FOR ME TO SIGN AND RETURN AND INCLUDED IN THESE ORDERS WAS THAT I SHOULD REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER ESTABLISHMENT OF WEBB-SITES ON THE INTERNET, BUT MY REPLY HAS BEEN THAT TO AGREE TO THESE CONDITIONS WOULD INFRINGE MY RIGHTS, AS AMENDED BY PROTOCOL NO. 11 ARTICLE 10. I QUOTE "EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM TO HOLD OPPINIONS AND RECEIVE AND IMPORT INFORMATION, AND IDEAS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE BY PUBLIC AUTHORITY AND REGARDLESS OF FRONTIERS ETC.
|
|
|
|
